<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Melissa officinalis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meloff.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog about the Great Big Garden of Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Blueberry bushes not leafing out? by Blueberry cultivation &#171; Organic gardening</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/blueberry-bushes-not-leafing-out/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueberry cultivation &#171; Organic gardening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Blueberry&#160;cultivation  Posted on May 2, 2008 by Marie-Therese   Blueberry bushes not leafing out? « Melissa officinalis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blueberry&nbsp;cultivation  Posted on May 2, 2008 by Marie-Therese   Blueberry bushes not leafing out? « Melissa officinalis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ha-lel-lew-yah! That means somefing&#8217;s pwetty! by How to get Inspiration?</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/ha-lel-lew-yah-that-means-somefings-pwetty/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>How to get Inspiration?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest of this superb post right here      No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest of this superb post right here      No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fasten Your Seatbelts by meloff</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/fasten-your-seatbelts/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>meloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Yes - and good points they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; and good points they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fasten Your Seatbelts by tommy49646</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/fasten-your-seatbelts/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy49646</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Lets Give Our New President Elect a Chance.

Most people who voted for Obama had no idea who he was or what he was. I guess the media did a good job selling him. McCain, although he is a good man, wasn&#039;t picked by republicans to run. He was picked by Democrat crossover voters in states who allow non party members to vote under any ticket they want. After they did that they went back to their Democrat home. McCain is no conservative. He doesn&#039;t seem to realize that when a republican walks across the aisle to work with Democrats they break your leg. If you reach across the aisle they break your arm. Their idea of bi-partisanship is simple. You give up your principals and do what we want. Coming together to them means that you compromise your ideas and accept theirs.

The biggest danger, even if Republicans regain control of congress in two years, will be all the judicial appointments that will be made in that time. I only hope that they will be unable to stack the supreme court with liberal appointments. FDR had 20 years to stack the court and it took a lifetime to turn it around. 

Of course we must not be too cruel to our new president. We should not call him a liar. 

We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry.

We should not call him a liar when he said utility bills would skyrocket because of the coal industry being regulated and taxed to death.

We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to redistribute the wealth.

We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to replace the military with a civillian force.

We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to meet with Iran without preconditions.

We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to invade Pakistan. 

We should not call Biden a liar when he said that supreme court appointments should be made based more on the  nominees philosophical views than on their judicial temperment. Can you say litmus test?

Hold onto your money belt we are in for a five ticket ride.

I could go on and on but I think you get the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets Give Our New President Elect a Chance.</p>
<p>Most people who voted for Obama had no idea who he was or what he was. I guess the media did a good job selling him. McCain, although he is a good man, wasn&#8217;t picked by republicans to run. He was picked by Democrat crossover voters in states who allow non party members to vote under any ticket they want. After they did that they went back to their Democrat home. McCain is no conservative. He doesn&#8217;t seem to realize that when a republican walks across the aisle to work with Democrats they break your leg. If you reach across the aisle they break your arm. Their idea of bi-partisanship is simple. You give up your principals and do what we want. Coming together to them means that you compromise your ideas and accept theirs.</p>
<p>The biggest danger, even if Republicans regain control of congress in two years, will be all the judicial appointments that will be made in that time. I only hope that they will be unable to stack the supreme court with liberal appointments. FDR had 20 years to stack the court and it took a lifetime to turn it around. </p>
<p>Of course we must not be too cruel to our new president. We should not call him a liar. </p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry.</p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said utility bills would skyrocket because of the coal industry being regulated and taxed to death.</p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to redistribute the wealth.</p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to replace the military with a civillian force.</p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to meet with Iran without preconditions.</p>
<p>We should not call him a liar when he said he wanted to invade Pakistan. </p>
<p>We should not call Biden a liar when he said that supreme court appointments should be made based more on the  nominees philosophical views than on their judicial temperment. Can you say litmus test?</p>
<p>Hold onto your money belt we are in for a five ticket ride.</p>
<p>I could go on and on but I think you get the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life is a Garden by Minda</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/hello-world/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Minda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Well written article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my Piggy Bank? by Jo</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/wheres-my-piggy-bank/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-34</guid>
		<description>oh yes... i&#039;m already feeling that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yes&#8230; i&#8217;m already feeling that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jumping in the Compost Pile. . . Doug Phillips Slanders the Bride of Christ by Mentarion</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/jumping-in-the-compost-pile-aka-doug-phillips-slanders-the-bride-of-christ/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Mentarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Whew! I&#039;m relieved Meloff that you don&#039;t think that Doug Phillips is a &quot;pasty, painfully effeminate little man with a Napoleon Complex in extreme denial about his true nature.&quot;

Much better that Doug Phillips &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; be known as a &quot;megalomaniac.&quot; 

Could I just add though that Doug Phillips and their immediate groupies are megalomaniacs &quot;in extreme denial about their true nature&quot;? Megalomaniacs always live in denial that they&#039;re megalomaniacs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! I&#8217;m relieved Meloff that you don&#8217;t think that Doug Phillips is a &#8220;pasty, painfully effeminate little man with a Napoleon Complex in extreme denial about his true nature.&#8221;</p>
<p>Much better that Doug Phillips <em>only</em> be known as a &#8220;megalomaniac.&#8221; </p>
<p>Could I just add though that Doug Phillips and their immediate groupies are megalomaniacs &#8220;in extreme denial about their true nature&#8221;? Megalomaniacs always live in denial that they&#8217;re megalomaniacs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jumping in the Compost Pile. . . Doug Phillips Slanders the Bride of Christ by meloff</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/jumping-in-the-compost-pile-aka-doug-phillips-slanders-the-bride-of-christ/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>meloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Wow, Leslie, you really should not hold back - it is bad for your health!

Seriously, while I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; think Doug and Scott and Voddie and their immediate groupies are megalomaniacs, I have not drawn the same conclusions as you about Doug Phillips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Leslie, you really should not hold back &#8211; it is bad for your health!</p>
<p>Seriously, while I <i>do</i> think Doug and Scott and Voddie and their immediate groupies are megalomaniacs, I have not drawn the same conclusions as you about Doug Phillips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jumping in the Compost Pile. . . Doug Phillips Slanders the Bride of Christ by Leslie Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/jumping-in-the-compost-pile-aka-doug-phillips-slanders-the-bride-of-christ/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Vision Forum founder Doug Phillips is a pasty, painfully effeminate little man with a Napoleon Complex in extreme denial about his true nature. In an attempt to forestall the dissemination of this information (as if it wasn’t patently obvious to all observers) he attempts to exert hypermasculine power in an extrabiblical manner against not just those he is in actual authority over, but all women. His attempts to banish “nags” and “churlish women” are obvious attacks against some female figure from his past. The truth will come out, if prior repentance has not occurred in that camp, it won’t be pretty . Judgment begins in the house of God. Selah. In His love He will do anything and go to any length to straighten us out. Should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vision Forum founder Doug Phillips is a pasty, painfully effeminate little man with a Napoleon Complex in extreme denial about his true nature. In an attempt to forestall the dissemination of this information (as if it wasn’t patently obvious to all observers) he attempts to exert hypermasculine power in an extrabiblical manner against not just those he is in actual authority over, but all women. His attempts to banish “nags” and “churlish women” are obvious attacks against some female figure from his past. The truth will come out, if prior repentance has not occurred in that camp, it won’t be pretty . Judgment begins in the house of God. Selah. In His love He will do anything and go to any length to straighten us out. Should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jumping in the Compost Pile. . . Doug Phillips Slanders the Bride of Christ by meloff</title>
		<link>http://meloff.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/jumping-in-the-compost-pile-aka-doug-phillips-slanders-the-bride-of-christ/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>meloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meloff.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, Colleen. You are correct. Heading off now to find my catalog (it has to be at the bottom of this trash can, somewhere. . . ).

Bwaa-ha-ha-ha!

Hysterical laughter aside, according to a friend who can stomach listening to him via the internet, Scott Brown did just recently preach a sermon from the BAB version* in which he says that the &quot;real&quot; meaning of slander is saying ANYTHING about someone. Good or bad. Truth or lie. 

And of course the BAB version is correct. Not thousands of years of how we have previously defined slander.

*BAB: Bible According to Brown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, Colleen. You are correct. Heading off now to find my catalog (it has to be at the bottom of this trash can, somewhere. . . ).</p>
<p>Bwaa-ha-ha-ha!</p>
<p>Hysterical laughter aside, according to a friend who can stomach listening to him via the internet, Scott Brown did just recently preach a sermon from the BAB version* in which he says that the &#8220;real&#8221; meaning of slander is saying ANYTHING about someone. Good or bad. Truth or lie. </p>
<p>And of course the BAB version is correct. Not thousands of years of how we have previously defined slander.</p>
<p>*BAB: Bible According to Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
